This model depicts the interactions of Aesop's Fable "The Boy Who Cried Wolf."
If you find these contributions meaningful your sponsorship would be greatly appreciated.
The boy is extremely [Bored Tending Sheep] and [Wants Attention].
These two factors influence the boy to [Cry Wolf] because of what he thinks will happen.
The boy believes that [Cry Wolf] will result in [Town's People Come Running] and he will become the [Center of Attention] and he will no longer be [Bored Tending Sheep].
If it were only that simple, yet there is generally more than one implication for an action.
When the boy [Cries Wolf] and there is [No Wolf] that means it's a [Lie].
[Lies] reduce the [Belief-O-Meter] and therefore reduce the likelihood that the [Town's People Come Running]. This makes it less likely that the boy will be the [Center of Attention] thus continuing the [Bored Tending Sheep] state.
But wait! There's more!
If the boy [Cries Wolf] and there is a [Wolf] then that represents [Truth] which increases the [Belief-O-Meter]. This then increases the likelihood that the [Town's People Come Running] making the boy the [Center of Attention] thus relieving the [Bored Tending Sheep] state.
What we now have is a story which should very convincingly demonstrate that the real implications of our actions may be counter-intuitive and lead to the exact opposite of what we're trying to accomplish.
Paul Aydelott has developed a version of this story from the Wolf's Perspective. Most interesting.