Your browser (Internet Explorer 8 or lower) is out of date. It has known security flaws and may not display all features of this and other websites. Learn how to update your browser.

X

Menu

Transport

2017 Weather & Climate Extreme Loss of Arable Land and Ocean Fertility by Guy Lakeman - The World3+ Model: Forecaster
Guy Lakeman

THE 2017 MODEL (BY GUY LAKEMAN) EMPHASIZES THE PEAK IN POLLUTION BEING CREATED BY OVERPOPULATION WITH THE CARRYING CAPACITY OF ARABLE LAND NOW BEING 1.5 TIMES OVER A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE (PASSED IN 1990) AND NOW INCREASING IN LOSS OF HUMAN SUSTAINABILITY DUE TO SEA RISE AND EXTREME GLOBAL WATER RELOCATION IN WEATHER CHANGES IN FLOODS AND DROUGHTS AND EXTENDED TROPICAL AND HORSE LATTITUDE CYCLONE ACTIVITY AROUND HADLEY CELLS

The World3 model is a detailed simulation of human population growth from 1900 into the future. It includes many environmental and demographic factors.

THIS MODEL BY GUY LAKEMAN, FROM METRICS OBTAINED USING A MORE COMPREHENSIVE VENSIM SOFTWARE MODEL, SHOWS CURRENT CONDITIONS CREATED BY THE LATEST WEATHER EXTREMES AND LOSS OF ARABLE LAND BY THE  ALBEDO EFECT MELTING THE POLAR CAPS TOGETHER WITH NORTHERN JETSTREAM SHIFT NORTHWARDS, AND A NECESSITY TO ACT BEFORE THERE IS HUGE SUFFERING.BY SETTING THE NEW ECOLOGICAL POLICIES TO 2015 WE CAN SEE THAT SOME POPULATIONS CAN BE SAVED BUT CITIES WILL SUFFER MOST. CURRENT MARKET SATURATION PLATEAU OF SOLID PRODUCTS AND BEHAVIORAL SINK FACTORS ARE ALSO ADDED

Use the sliders to experiment with the initial amount of non-renewable resources to see how these affect the simulation. Does increasing the amount of non-renewable resources (which could occur through the development of better exploration technologies) improve our future? Also, experiment with the start date of a low birth-rate, environmentally focused policy.

Environment Demographics Population Growth Population Weather Climate Failure Death Mortality Science Technology Engineering Strategy Economics Politics Fertility Health Services Resources Land Jobs Labor Urban Industrial Rural Lifetime Pollution Regeneration Yield Ocean Sea Fish Plants Animals Flood Drought Loss Hurricane Typhoon Tornado Cyclone Agriculture Food Energy Nuclear Solar Resource Graphene Silicene Transport

  • 3 weeks 2 days ago

2018 OVERPOPULATION LEADS TO POLLUTION based on Weather & Climate Extreme Loss of Arable Land and Ocean Fertility by Guy Lakeman - The World3+ Model: Forecaster
Guy Lakeman

THE 2018 MODEL (BY GUY LAKEMAN) EMPHASIZES THE PEAK IN POLLUTION BEING CREATED BY OVERPOPULATION.
WITH THE CARRYING CAPACITY OF ARABLE LAND NOW BEING 1.5 TIMES OVER A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE (PASSED IN 1990) AND NOW INCREASING IN LOSS OF HUMAN SUSTAINABILITY DUE TO SEA RISE AND EXTREME GLOBAL WATER RELOCATION IN WEATHER CHANGES IN FLOODS AND DROUGHTS AND EXTENDED TROPICAL AND HORSE LATTITUDE CYCLONE ACTIVITY AROUND HADLEY CELLS

The World3 model is a detailed simulation of human population growth from 1900 into the future. It includes many environmental and demographic factors.

THIS MODEL BY GUY LAKEMAN, FROM METRICS OBTAINED USING A MORE COMPREHENSIVE VENSIM SOFTWARE MODEL, SHOWS CURRENT CONDITIONS CREATED BY THE LATEST WEATHER EXTREMES AND LOSS OF ARABLE LAND BY THE  ALBEDO EFECT MELTING THE POLAR CAPS TOGETHER WITH NORTHERN JETSTREAM SHIFT NORTHWARDS, AND A NECESSITY TO ACT BEFORE THERE IS HUGE SUFFERING.BY SETTING THE NEW ECOLOGICAL POLICIES TO 2015 WE CAN SEE THAT SOME POPULATIONS CAN BE SAVED BUT CITIES WILL SUFFER MOST. CURRENT MARKET SATURATION PLATEAU OF SOLID PRODUCTS AND BEHAVIORAL SINK FACTORS ARE ALSO ADDED

Use the sliders to experiment with the initial amount of non-renewable resources to see how these affect the simulation. Does increasing the amount of non-renewable resources (which could occur through the development of better exploration technologies) improve our future? Also, experiment with the start date of a low birth-rate, environmentally focused policy.

Environment Demographics Population Growth Population Weather Climate Failure Death Mortality Science Technology Engineering Strategy Economics Politics Fertility Health Services Resources Land Jobs Labor Urban Industrial Rural Lifetime Pollution Regeneration Yield Ocean Sea Fish Plants Animals Flood Drought Loss Hurricane Typhoon Tornado Cyclone Agriculture Food Energy Nuclear Solar Resource Graphene Silicene Transport

  • 3 weeks 3 days ago

Time to get rid of Cars and Hop On Hoverboards
David Warner
 ‘’You take your car to work, I’ll take my board’’, Once said by Weezer.
There is no dispute that vehicles are polluting our environment and forcing us to adapt to the transport system in our daily routine matters. To the very high extent, we're using vehicles for our every journey whether it's long or short. We fall into this trap that through this we save our time. No doubt, it saves time but at the cost of health and money. So, it’s time to ditch your normal and boring cars and get back to cycling or hop on board. There are countless benefits of riding a bicycle which includes both health and wealth, so in this insight, we are going to focus on this specific issue.
But there’s a catch with the bicycles as they are quite slow and requires a lot of effort. So it’s better to go for the system which is more practical, easy to use in day to day life and saves our time too.
So, without getting into other details, let’s start our discussion of the advantages of Electric Skateboarding.
Advantages
Let's check out some of the advantages of electric skateboards which will certainly convince you to get rid of your fueled car.
1.       Time and Traffic: As per the research made by the US Department of Transportation, more than 85 percent of American's spends an average of 300 hours on the road while driving.
2.       Cost: Traveling is very expensive if you take your own vehicle to the drive. However according to this study, an average American spends $2600 per year on a vehicle including fuel, wear and tear, and some other expenses. So, if you hop on the electric skateboard, which is much cheaper and costs only once. As per the Reviews Crush you can get a good quality skateboard in as less as $50 and as high as $1000. In this way, you would probably save an estimate of $2600 per year on gasoline alone.
3.       Bicycle or Skateboards: If you go for the bike then it would require some of your energy whereas electric skateboards are a lot more fun than your bicycle ride as they are quite fast. The average speed of electric skateboard is 15 to 26 mph.
4.       Speed: If you think buses or trains move much faster in the city areas then have a look at this study of American Public Transportation Association in which they provided the facts related to speed. As per them, the average speed of rail transit is not more than 28km/h and the average speed of bus transit is only 20km/h.
5.       Everyone Is Doing It: According to a study conducted by Parks and Recreation there are almost 16 million skateboarders in the USA and the trends are just growing and growing with the new electric skateboards on the shelves.
Hope this informational piece of writing on advantages of electric skateboards convinced you to get rid of the car and get on it quickly.

Technology Transport Environment

  • 3 weeks 6 days ago

M60 - Manchester (#7) (2016 data)
Fasih Munir
Congestion shown in total hours Congestion factor is the hours you spend in traffic a day
Vehicle rate is an average from 2012-2016 Integration factor depends on number of people willing to pay for cost multiplied by number of people who switch. People who switch = public vehicles / all vehicles Hyperloop wait=averagewaiting time compared to london tube Assuming one person per vehicle 
Edit to make it the congestion time for the yearly basis as the vehicle number is for the whole year 
Another outside factor that could adversely affect HL use? Maybe development of other technologies 

Transport

  • 2 months 4 days ago

Pages