The simulation model provides a holistic insight into the e-Customers’ dynamic behavior during online shopping sessions, and combines both qualitative and quantitative aspects of the interaction between e‑Customers and a hypothetical e-Commerce website. It takes into account the existence of three classes of e-Customers: 'Spendthrifts', 'Average Spenders', and 'Tightwads', and an operational profile based on these three classes, which assumes 24% 'Tightwads', 61% 'Average Spenders', and 15% 'Spendthrifts'.

e-Commerce prediction rate for evaluation.

This is DRAFT and non-functional

The simulation model provides a holistic insight into the e-Customers’ dynamic behavior during online shopping sessions, and combines both qualitative and quantitative aspects of the interaction between e‑Customers and a hypothetical e-Commerce website. It takes into account the existence of three classes of e-Customers: 'Spendthrifts', 'Average Spenders', and 'Tightwads', and an operational profile based on these three classes, which assumes 24% 'Tightwads', 61% 'Average Spenders', and 15% 'Spendthrifts'.

The simulation model provides a holistic insight into the e-Customers’ dynamic behavior during online shopping sessions, and combines both qualitative and quantitative aspects of the interaction between e‑Customers and a hypothetical e-Commerce website. It takes into account the existence of three classes of e-Customers: 'Spendthrifts', 'Average Spenders', and 'Tightwads', and an operational profile based on these three classes, which assumes 24% 'Tightwads', 61% 'Average Spenders', and 15% 'Spendthrifts'.

The simulation model provides a holistic insight into the e-Customers’ dynamic behavior during online shopping sessions, and combines both qualitative and quantitative aspects of the interaction between e‑Customers and a hypothetical e-Commerce website. It takes into account the existence of three classes of e-Customers: 'Spendthrifts', 'Average Spenders', and 'Tightwads', and an operational profile based on these three classes, which assumes 24% 'Tightwads', 61% 'Average Spenders', and 15% 'Spendthrifts'.

The simulation model provides a holistic insight into the e-Customers’ dynamic behavior during online shopping sessions, and combines both qualitative and quantitative aspects of the interaction between e‑Customers and a hypothetical e-Commerce website. It takes into account the existence of three classes of e-Customers: 'Spendthrifts', 'Average Spenders', and 'Tightwads', and an operational profile based on these three classes, which assumes 24% 'Tightwads', 61% 'Average Spenders', and 15% 'Spendthrifts'.

The simulation model provides a holistic insight into the e-Customers’ dynamic behavior during online shopping sessions, and combines both qualitative and quantitative aspects of the interaction between e‑Customers and a hypothetical e-Commerce website. It takes into account the existence of three classes of e-Customers: 'Spendthrifts', 'Average Spenders', and 'Tightwads', and an operational profile based on these three classes, which assumes 24% 'Tightwads', 61% 'Average Spenders', and 15% 'Spendthrifts'.

The simulation model provides a holistic insight into the e-Customers’ dynamic behavior during online shopping sessions, and combines both qualitative and quantitative aspects of the interaction between e‑Customers and a hypothetical e-Commerce website. It takes into account the existence of three classes of e-Customers: 'Spendthrifts', 'Average Spenders', and 'Tightwads', and an operational profile based on these three classes, which assumes 24% 'Tightwads', 61% 'Average Spenders', and 15% 'Spendthrifts'.

The simulation model provides a holistic insight into the e-Customers’ dynamic behavior during online shopping sessions, and combines both qualitative and quantitative aspects of the interaction between e‑Customers and a hypothetical e-Commerce website. It takes into account the existence of three classes of e-Customers: 'Spendthrifts', 'Average Spenders', and 'Tightwads', and an operational profile based on these three classes, which assumes 24% 'Tightwads', 61% 'Average Spenders', and 15% 'Spendthrifts'.