Agile | Insight Maker

This simulation allows you to compare different approaches to influence flow, the Flow Times and the throughput of a work process.

By adjusting the sliders below you can

observe the work process without any work in process limitations (WIP Limits),
with process step specific WIP Limits* (work state WIP limits),
or you may want to see the impact of the Tameflow approach with Kanban Token and Replenishment Token
or see the impact of the Drum-Buffer-Rope** method.

* Well know in (agile) Kanban

** Known in the physical world of factory production

The "Tameflow approach" using Kanban Token and Replenishment Token as well as the Drum-Buffer-Rope method take oth the Constraint (the weakest link of the work process) into consideration when pulling in new work items into the delivery "system".

You can also simulate the effects of PUSH instead of PULL.

Feel free to play around and recognize the different effects of work scheduling methods.

If you have questions or feedback get in touch via twitter @swilluda

The work flow itself

Look at the simulation as if you would look on a kanban board.

The simulation mimics a "typical" software delivery process.

From left to right you find the following ten process steps.

Input Queue (Backlog)
Selected for work (waiting for analysis or work break down)
Analyse, break down and understand
Waiting for development
In development
Waiting for review
In review
Waiting for deployment
In deployment
Done

Kanban Board Simulation - WIP Limit, Tameflow Kanban Token and Drum-Buffer-Rope

Stefan Willuda

10

This simulation allows you to compare different approaches to influence flow, the Flow Times and the throughput of a work process. The simulation is described in the blog post "Starting late - The Superior Scheduling Approach - How, despite being identical, one company delivers almost 10 times the value of its competitor using flow-oriented project initiation."

By adjusting the slider below you can observe the work process

without any work in process limitations (WIP Limits),
with process step specific WIP Limits* (work state WIP limits),
with Kanban Token and Replenishment Token based on the Tameflow approach (a form of drum-buffer-rope)
with Drum Buffer Rope** scheduling method.

* Well know in (agile) Kanban

** Known in the physical world of factory production

The simulation and the comparison between the different scheduling approaches can be seen here -> https://youtu.be/xXvdVkxeMMQ

The "Tameflow approach" using Kanban Token and Replenishment Token as well as the Drum Buffer Rope method take the Constraint (the weakest link of the work process) into consideration when pulling in new work items into the delivery "system".

Feel free to play around and recognize the different effects of work scheduling methods.

If you have questions or feedback get in touch via twitter @swilluda

The work flow itself

Look at the simulation as if you would look on a kanban board.

The simulation mimics a "typical" feature delivery process on portfolio level.

From left to right you find the following ten process steps.

Ideas
Selected ideas (waiting)
Initiate and pitch
Waiting for preparation
Prepare
Waiting for delivery
Deliver
Waiting for closure
Close and communicate
Closed

[Published] Simulation Starting late - The Superior Scheduling Approach (simplified version)

Stefan Willuda

4

This simulation allows you to compare different approaches to influence flow, the Flow Times and the throughput of a work process.

By adjusting the sliders below you can

observe the work process without any work in process limitations (WIP Limits),
with process step specific WIP Limits* (work state WIP limits),
or you may want to see the impact of the Tameflow approach with Kanban Token and Replenishment Token
or see the impact of the Drum-Buffer-Rope** method.

* Well know in (agile) Kanban

** Known in the physical world of factory production

The "Tameflow approach" using Kanban Token and Replenishment Token as well as the Drum-Buffer-Rope method take oth the Constraint (the weakest link of the work process) into consideration when pulling in new work items into the delivery "system".

You can also simulate the effects of PUSH instead of PULL.

Feel free to play around and recognize the different effects of work scheduling methods.

If you have questions or feedback get in touch via twitter @swilluda

The work flow itself

Look at the simulation as if you would look on a kanban board.

The simulation mimics a "typical" software delivery process.

From left to right you find the following ten process steps.

Input Queue (Backlog)
Selected for work (waiting for analysis or work break down)
Analyse, break down and understand
Waiting for development
In development
Waiting for review
In review
Waiting for deployment
In deployment
Done

[Archive] Kanban Board Simulation - WIP Limit, Tameflow Kanban Token and Drum-Buffer-Rope

Stefan Willuda

15

Mais informações no link https://conaenge.com.br/kanban-e-o-limite-de-wip-work-in-progress/

--------------------

Modeling a kanban based project flow.

Clone of Software Development Process - Kanban

Nilo Guimaraes

This simulation mimics the flow of projects through an organization. The organization consists of teams that idependently or collaboratively work on projects. Many of the projects have a mulit-team dependency.

If you want to understand more in depth what this simulation is all about, read this blog post: https://stefan-willuda.medium.com/super-powerful-how-full-kitting-will-speed-up-your-cross-team-projects-1598d55fa9d7

[Published] Full Kitting in Dependent Team Delivery

Stefan Willuda

4

This simulation makes the negative effects of starting work too soon visible. You can play around with the parameters.

Find the full story behind this simulation here.

If you have questions or feedback get in touch via @swilluda

[Published] Effect of starting work too soon

Stefan Willuda

4

A model of issue generation and resolution at a software company

Software Issue Rate

Serdar Benderli

This simulation allows you to compare different approaches to influence flow, the Flow Times and the throughput of a work process. The simulation is described in the blog post "Starting late - The Superior Scheduling Approach - How, despite being identical, one company delivers almost 10 times the value of its competitor using flow-oriented project initiation."

By adjusting the slider below you can observe the work process

without any work in process limitations (WIP Limits),
with process step specific WIP Limits* (work state WIP limits),
with Kanban Token and Replenishment Token based on the Tameflow approach (a form of drum-buffer-rope)
with Drum Buffer Rope** scheduling method.

* Well know in (agile) Kanban

** Known in the physical world of factory production

The simulation and the comparison between the different scheduling approaches can be seen here -> https://youtu.be/xXvdVkxeMMQ

The "Tameflow approach" using Kanban Token and Replenishment Token as well as the Drum Buffer Rope method take the Constraint (the weakest link of the work process) into consideration when pulling in new work items into the delivery "system".

Feel free to play around and recognize the different effects of work scheduling methods.

If you have questions or feedback get in touch via twitter @swilluda

The work flow itself

Look at the simulation as if you would look on a kanban board.

The simulation mimics a "typical" feature delivery process on portfolio level.

From left to right you find the following ten process steps.

Ideas
Selected ideas (waiting)
Initiate and pitch
Waiting for preparation
Prepare
Waiting for delivery
Deliver
Waiting for closure
Close and communicate
Closed

[Published] Simulation Starting late - The Superior Scheduling Approach (advanced version)

Stefan Willuda

4

A model of issue generation and resolution at a software company

Clone of Software Issue Rate

Gautam

This simulation makes the negative effects of starting work too soon visible. You can play around with the parameters.

Find the full story behind this simulation here.

If you have questions or feedback get in touch via @swilluda

Clone of [Published] Effect of starting work too soon

Carl Gomersall

This simulation makes the negative effects of starting work too soon visible. You can play around with the parameters.

Find the full story behind this simulation here.

If you have questions or feedback get in touch via @swilluda

Clone of [Published] Effect of starting work too soon

Carl Gomersall

This simulation makes the negative effects of starting work too soon visible. You can play around with the parameters.

Find the full story behind this simulation here.

If you have questions or feedback get in touch via @swilluda

Clone of [Published] Effect of starting work too soon

Urs Andelfinger

Models capacity and flow.

Clone of Work flow

sub cribed

Models capacity and flow.

Clone of Work flow

sub cribed

This simulation allows you to compare different approaches to influence flow, the Flow Times and the throughput of a work process. The simulation is described in the blog post "Starting late - The Superior Scheduling Approach - How, despite being identical, one company delivers almost 10 times the value of its competitor using flow-oriented project initiation."

By adjusting the slider below you can observe the work process

without any work in process limitations (WIP Limits),
with process step specific WIP Limits* (work state WIP limits),
with Kanban Token and Replenishment Token based on the Tameflow approach (a form of drum-buffer-rope)
with Drum Buffer Rope** scheduling method.

* Well know in (agile) Kanban

** Known in the physical world of factory production

The simulation and the comparison between the different scheduling approaches can be seen here -> https://youtu.be/xXvdVkxeMMQ

The "Tameflow approach" using Kanban Token and Replenishment Token as well as the Drum Buffer Rope method take the Constraint (the weakest link of the work process) into consideration when pulling in new work items into the delivery "system".

Feel free to play around and recognize the different effects of work scheduling methods.

If you have questions or feedback get in touch via twitter @swilluda

The work flow itself

Look at the simulation as if you would look on a kanban board.

The simulation mimics a "typical" feature delivery process on portfolio level.

From left to right you find the following ten process steps.

Ideas
Selected ideas (waiting)
Initiate and pitch
Waiting for preparation
Prepare
Waiting for delivery
Deliver
Waiting for closure
Close and communicate
Closed

Clone of [Published] Simulation Starting late - The Superior Scheduling Approach (simplified version)

Urs Andelfinger

Clone of CI-task-size

sub cribed

This simulation allows you to compare different approaches to influence flow, the Flow Times and the throughput of a work process.

By adjusting the sliders below you can

observe the work process without any work in process limitations (WIP Limits),
with process step specific WIP Limits* (work state WIP limits),
or you may want to see the impact of the Tameflow approach with Kanban Token and Replenishment Token
or see the impact of the Drum-Buffer-Rope** method.

* Well know in (agile) Kanban

** Known in the physical world of factory production

The "Tameflow approach" using Kanban Token and Replenishment Token as well as the Drum-Buffer-Rope method take oth the Constraint (the weakest link of the work process) into consideration when pulling in new work items into the delivery "system".

You can also simulate the effects of PUSH instead of PULL.

Feel free to play around and recognize the different effects of work scheduling methods.

If you have questions or feedback get in touch via twitter @swilluda

The work flow itself

Look at the simulation as if you would look on a kanban board.

The simulation mimics a "typical" software delivery process.

From left to right you find the following ten process steps.

Input Queue (Backlog)
Selected for work (waiting for analysis or work break down)
Analyse, break down and understand
Waiting for development
In development
Waiting for review
In review
Waiting for deployment
In deployment
Done

Clone of [Archive] Kanban Board Simulation - WIP Limit, Tameflow Kanban Token and Drum-Buffer-Rope

A. Husak

An agent based

Agile Sprint Success Simulation

Kunal Nain

CI-task-size

Phil Ruff

Models capacity and flow.

Work flow

Ulrich Staudinger

This simulation mimics the flow of projects through an organization. The organization consists of teams that idependently or collaboratively work on projects. Many of the projects have a mulit-team dependency.

If you want to understand more in depth what this simulation is all about, read this blog post: https://stefan-willuda.medium.com/super-powerful-how-full-kitting-will-speed-up-your-cross-team-projects-1598d55fa9d7

Clone of [Published] Full Kitting in Dependent Team Delivery

Johan Persson

8 months ago

This simulation mimics the flow of projects through an organization. The organization consists of teams that idependently or collaboratively work on projects. Many of the projects have a mulit-team dependency.

If you want to understand more in depth what this simulation is all about, read this blog post: https://stefan-willuda.medium.com/super-powerful-how-full-kitting-will-speed-up-your-cross-team-projects-1598d55fa9d7

Clone of [Published] Full Kitting in Dependent Team Delivery

Johan Persson

10 months ago

This simulation mimics the flow of projects through an organization. The organization consists of teams that idependently or collaboratively work on projects. Many of the projects have a mulit-team dependency.

If you want to understand more in depth what this simulation is all about, read this blog post: https://stefan-willuda.medium.com/super-powerful-how-full-kitting-will-speed-up-your-cross-team-projects-1598d55fa9d7

Clone of [Published] Full Kitting in Dependent Team Delivery

Johan Persson

10 months ago

This simulation allows you to compare different approaches to influence flow, the Flow Times and the throughput of a work process. The simulation is described in the blog post "Starting late - The Superior Scheduling Approach - How, despite being identical, one company delivers almost 10 times the value of its competitor using flow-oriented project initiation."

By adjusting the slider below you can observe the work process

without any work in process limitations (WIP Limits),
with process step specific WIP Limits* (work state WIP limits),
with Kanban Token and Replenishment Token based on the Tameflow approach (a form of drum-buffer-rope)
with Drum Buffer Rope** scheduling method.

* Well know in (agile) Kanban

** Known in the physical world of factory production

The simulation and the comparison between the different scheduling approaches can be seen here -> https://youtu.be/xXvdVkxeMMQ

The "Tameflow approach" using Kanban Token and Replenishment Token as well as the Drum Buffer Rope method take the Constraint (the weakest link of the work process) into consideration when pulling in new work items into the delivery "system".

Feel free to play around and recognize the different effects of work scheduling methods.

If you have questions or feedback get in touch via twitter @swilluda

The work flow itself

Look at the simulation as if you would look on a kanban board.

The simulation mimics a "typical" feature delivery process on portfolio level.

From left to right you find the following ten process steps.

Ideas
Selected ideas (waiting)
Initiate and pitch
Waiting for preparation
Prepare
Waiting for delivery
Deliver
Waiting for closure
Close and communicate
Closed

Clone of [Published] Simulation Starting late - The Superior Scheduling Approach (advanced version)

sub cribed

Agile Models