A visual look at using technology in school based on the article:
Levin, B. B., & Schrum, L. (2013). Using systems thinking to leverage technology for school improvement: Lessons learned from award-winning secondary Schools/Districts. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(1), 29-51.
Initial causal loop diagram for the influences leading to the acceptance of Systems Thinking. This is the evolving version. You can compare this with IM-1948, which is the original, if you wish.
If you find these contributions meaningful your sponsorship would be greatly appreciated.
Identify and map audience system archetype, including
potential/anticipated leverage points, conflicts, unknowns, etc. for
each of the personas. You will illustrate your findings using causal
loop diagrams
A visual look at using technology in school based on the article:
Levin, B. B., & Schrum, L. (2013). Using systems thinking to leverage technology for school improvement: Lessons learned from award-winning secondary Schools/Districts. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(1), 29-51.
A visual look at using technology in school based on the article:
Levin, B. B., & Schrum, L. (2013). Using systems thinking to leverage technology for school improvement: Lessons learned from award-winning secondary Schools/Districts. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(1), 29-51.
A visual look at using technology in school based on the article:
Levin, B. B., & Schrum, L. (2013). Using systems thinking to leverage technology for school improvement: Lessons learned from award-winning secondary Schools/Districts. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(1), 29-51.
Identify and map audience system archetype, including
potential/anticipated leverage points, conflicts, unknowns, etc. for
each of the personas. You will illustrate your findings using causal
loop diagrams
A visual look at using technology in school based on the article:
Levin, B. B., & Schrum, L. (2013). Using systems thinking to leverage technology for school improvement: Lessons learned from award-winning secondary Schools/Districts. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(1), 29-51.
Jackson's System of Systems Methodology (SOSM) framework presents a construct that enables one to begin to make sense of the broad array of approaches that claim to embrace the Systems Thinking paradigm.
A visual look at using technology in school based on the article:
Levin, B. B., & Schrum, L. (2013). Using systems thinking to leverage technology for school improvement: Lessons learned from award-winning secondary Schools/Districts. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(1), 29-51.
Identify and map audience system archetype, including
potential/anticipated leverage points, conflicts, unknowns, etc. for
each of the personas. You will illustrate your findings using causal
loop diagrams
A visual look at using technology in school based on the article:
Levin, B. B., & Schrum, L. (2013). Using systems thinking to leverage technology for school improvement: Lessons learned from award-winning secondary Schools/Districts. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(1), 29-51.
A visual look at using technology in school based on the article:
Levin, B. B., & Schrum, L. (2013). Using systems thinking to leverage technology for school improvement: Lessons learned from award-winning secondary Schools/Districts. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(1), 29-51.
Perspective
taking reveals aspects of complex systems.
This is a natural starting point for systemic investigations, since one
can only see aspects of complex systems and never the entire system. The graph
shows that investigating these aspects to get a deeper understanding requires examining them through appropriate interpretive
concepts of which systems thinking has many to offer. However, not all systems
thinking methodologies concentrate on the investigation the dynamic
feedback mechanism of systems. Systems thinking methodologies that ignore feedback mechanisms do not possess a suitable contextual vocabulary for their investigation, and as a result do not offer
any advantage over other investigative methodologies
when it comes to investigating the dynamic systems that are traditionally the
target of systemic investigation.