From HBR study, 2014; combined with Solow Growth Model, explains why business seeks technological solutions. Yet this is not sustainable, as there is a limit to the number of STEM-trained individuals to create technological solutions.
Predator-prey
models are the building masses of the bio-and environments as bio
masses are become out of their asset masses. Species contend, advance and
scatter essentially to look for assets to support their battle for their very
presence. Contingent upon their particular settings of uses, they can take the
types of asset resource-consumer, plant-herbivore, parasite-have, tumor cells-
immune structure, vulnerable irresistible collaborations, and so on. They
manage the general misfortune win connections and thus may have applications
outside of biological systems. At the point when focused connections are
painstakingly inspected, they are regularly in actuality a few types of
predator-prey communication in simulation.
Looking at Lotka-Volterra Model:
The well
known Italian mathematician Vito Volterra proposed a differential condition
model to clarify the watched increment in predator fish in the Adriatic Sea
during World War I. Simultaneously in the United States, the conditions
contemplated by Volterra were determined freely by Alfred Lotka (1925) to
portray a theoretical synthetic response wherein the concoction fixations
waver. The Lotka-Volterra model is the least complex model of predator-prey
communications. It depends on direct per capita development rates, which are
composed as f=b−py and g=rx−d.
A detailed explanation of the parameters:
The parameter b
is the development rate of species x (the prey) without communication with
species y (the predators). Prey numbers are reduced by these collaborations:
The per capita development rate diminishes (here directly) with expanding
y, conceivably getting to be negative.
The parameter p
estimates the effect of predation on x˙/x.
The parameter d
is the death rate of species y without connection with species x.
The term rx
means the net rate of development of the predator population in light of
the size of the prey population.
Crea un Bucle de Realimentación Negativa, modelando el llenado de un vaso con agua. Esta versión incluye el concepto de manejo de tabla o no liberalidad.
Con la implementación del enfoque STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics), se busca formar jóvenes más curiosos, críticos y propositivos, que busquen dar solución a problemas reales de su entorno, región o país. De igual forma se puede explorar la orientación vocacional de los estudiantes, exponiendolos a situaciones problemáticas y retos que a través de preguntas orientadoras y acceso a diversas herramientas tecnológicas, les permita llegar a una propuesta para dar solución al problema planteado.
Trying to use a diagram to show that a bad "early start" leads to low rates of progress/yr. With low rates of progress/year the kiddos fall much shorter than their peers and can't meet the milestones expected for the cohort. Failing to meet these, they fail and other negative long-term consequence are likely to follow.
The probability density function (PDF) of the normal distribution or Bell Curve of Normal or Gaussian Distribution is the mean or expectation of the distribution (and also its median and mode).
The parameter is its standard deviation with its variance then, A random variable with a Gaussian distribution is said to be normally distributed and is called a normal deviate.
However, those who enjoy upskirts are called deviants and have a variable distribution :)
A random variable with a Gaussian distribution is said to be normally distributed and is called a normal deviate.
If mu = 0 and sigma = 1
If the Higher Education Numbers Are Increased then the group decision making ability of society would be raised above that of a middle teenager as it is now
BUT
Governments can control children by using bad parenting techniques, pandering to the pleasure principle, so they will make higher education more and more difficult as they are doing
85% of the population has a qualification level equal or below a 12th grader, 17 year old ... the chance of finding someone with any sense is low (~1 in 6) and the outcome of them being chosen by those who are uneducated in the policies they are to decide is even more rare !!!
Experience means little if you don't have enough brain to analyse it
Democracy is only as good as the ability of the voters to FULLY understand the implications of the policies on which they vote., both context and the various perspectives. National voting of unqualified voters on specific policy issues is the sign of corrupt manipulation.
Democracy: Where a group allows the decision ability of a teenager to decide on a choice of mis-representatives who are unqualified to make judgement on social policies that affect the lives of millions.
The kind of children who would vote for King Kong who can hold a girl in one hand and swat fighter jets out of teh sky off the tallest building, doesn't have a brain cell or thought to call his own but has a nice smile and offers little girls sweets.
