Use Insight Maker to create rich pictures and causal loop diagrams.
Then make shareable simulation models. All right in your browser,
for free. Just sign up for a free
account and start modeling now.
Create an Insight Maker account to start building
models.
Insight Maker is completely free.
Start Now
Insight Maker runs in your web-browser. No downloads or plugins are
needed. Start converting your ideas into your rich pictures,
simulation models and Insights now. Features
Simulate
Explore powerful simulation algorithms for System Dynamics and Agent
Based Modeling. Use System Dynamics to gain insights into your
system and Agent Based Modeling to dig into the details. Types of Modeling
Collaborate
Sharing models has never been this easy. Send a link, embed in a
blog, or collaborate with others. It couldn't be simpler. More
Free & Open
Build your models for free. Share them with others for free. Harness
the power of Insight Maker for free. Open code mean security and
transparency. More
Explore What Others Are Building
Here is a sample of public Insights made by Insight Maker users. This list is auto-generated and updated daily.
WIP based on Where profits come from paper , Nathan Tankus blog and other historical sources
If private bond holdings are going down and the government is running a big deficit then the central bank has to monetize bonds equal to the deficit plus the decrease in private bond holdings. We don't show the details of the central bank buying bonds here, just the net results.
See blog at http://howfiatdies.blogspot.com for more on hyperinflation, including a hyperinflation FAQ.
A Tragedy of the Commons situation exists whenever two or more activities, each, which in order to produce results, rely on a shared limited resource. Results for these activities continue to develop as long as their use of the limited resource doesn't exceed the resource limit. Once this limit is reached the results produced by each activity are limited to the level at which the resource is replenished. See also Archetypes.
Video
This model is part of
And? Understanding Relationships & Their Implications.
This simulation allows you to compare different approaches to influence flow, the Flow Times and the throughput of a work process.
By adjusting the sliders below you can
observe the work process without any work in process limitations (WIP Limits),
with process step specific WIP Limits* (work state WIP limits),
or you may want to see the impact of the Tameflow approach with Kanban Token and Replenishment Token
or see the impact of the Drum-Buffer-Rope** method.
* Well know in (agile) Kanban
** Known in the physical world of factory production
The "Tameflow approach" using Kanban Token and Replenishment Token as well as the Drum-Buffer-Rope method take oth the Constraint (the weakest link of the work process) into consideration when pulling in new work items into the delivery "system".
You can also simulate the effects of PUSH instead of PULL.
Feel free to play around and recognize the different effects of work scheduling methods.
If you have questions or feedback get in touch via twitter @swilluda
The work flow itself
Look at the simulation as if you would look on a kanban board.
The simulation mimics a "typical" software delivery process.
From left to right you find the following ten process steps.
Input Queue (Backlog)
Selected for work (waiting for analysis or work break down)
Tomar el camino más fácil asegura que uno tendrá que tomar el camino más fácil repetidamente, y hace más difícil buscar la mejor solución a largo plazo.
