The virtuous reinforcing loop is what happens when you just do it with a trial and learning mindset.

@LinkedIn, Twitter, YouTube

The Reinforcing Loop Systems Archetype is one of the two most basic Systems Archetypes. The Balancing Loop being the other one.

@LinkedIn, Twitter, YouTube

Two goal seeking structures attempting to resolve and based on the delay one may tend to settle for less. See also Archetypes.

An example of how to separate connections when they're overlaid.

It's relatively well understood that you can't be all things to all people. Somewhere one has to make choices. An Attractiveness Principle Systems Archetype is essentially a Limits to Growth Systems Archetype with multiple limits, all of which can not be addressed equally.

The Flipping a Coin insight computes and display the cumulative results of flipping a coin for 1,000 flips.

@LinkedIn, Twitter, YouTube

When the relevant interactions are identified it's appropriate to identify which elements are the responsibility of which stakeholders, which elements are part of the addressable interactions and which elements are part of the environment.

The goal seeking structure endeavors to bring a balance between a current state and a desired state. This is one of the two foundation archetypes. The other being the growth structure. See also Archetypes.

Maybe this makes sense in terms of how to access past values in Insight Maker.

The numerous Systems Archetypes popularized by Peter Senge, and others seem to be the source of great confusion for many. In response to this Eric Wolstenholme has endeavored to simplify the System Archetypes by mapping them to four generic archetypes.

This is the model model that was developed during the Insight Maker Relationship Modeling webcast on 19.05.16.

@LinkedIn, Twitter, YouTube

This model depicts the interactions of Aesop's Fable "The Boy Who Cried Wolf."

Inventory Model v4.0 calculates min days inv & max days inv and makes adjustments for desired service level. See also: Inventory Model v3.0.

Investigating the behavior of several variables over time has probably raised more questions than answers. As such now it's time to investigate what else might be influencing the trending of these variables.

When the typical approach doesn't work we tend to rely on our tried and true problem solving approaches, which as you will see really aren't that good.

The three basic simulation structures.

Network Magic's rapid growth creates a growing demand for resources. And the more they satisfy their customers the more difficult the problem becomes.

Video

Simple bathtub model to show the difference between Stock and Flow. Run the model with various values for filling and draining to see the implications.

@LinkedIn, Twitter, YouTube

Based on 1990 SDR Article. Control systems act to make their own input match internal standards or reference signals. Competent control systems create illusions of stimulus response causality. Stimulus-response theory can approximate the relationship between disturbance and action, but it can't predict the consequences of behavior. These consequences are maintained despite disturbances. See also Double loop learning and Nurse Thinking Insights.

Use a bathtub model to investigate the manner in which inflows and outflows govern the quantity of a stock. Extend the structure to create and investigate the relationships of a goal seeking balancing loop.

@LinkedIn, Twitter, YouTube

One of the four basic model forms presented by Hannon & Ruth in Dynamic Modeling.

@LinkedIn, Twitter, YouTube

Macros are very useful for defining functions that need to be repeatedly at various places in the model.

A Conveyor is just a special type of a stock.