The Problem:
What is the true cost of escalation?
Things to measure: How does this impact:1. (MONEY) Cost per incident - what does this cost the business? 2. (TIME) Service Level - how does this impact desired service levels/SLAs? 3. (PEOPLE) Agent utilization - how does this impact backlog? are we overworking engineers? Does this contribute to staff burnout?
Clone of AGILE 2017: True Cost of Escalation
The Problem:
What is the true cost of escalating too many Tier 1/Level 1 tickets to Level 2/3 engineers?
Things to measure: How does this impact:1. (MONEY) Cost per incident - what does this cost the business? 2. (TIME) Service Level - how does this impact desired service levels/SLAs? 3. (PEOPLE) Agent utilization - how does this impact backlog? are we overworking engineers? Does this contribute to staff burnout?
Clone of OSCON 2017: Help Desk - True Cost Impact of Improper Escalation
Purpose
Enables the different components in the 5 capability model in a visual manner for Enterprise and Business Architecture stakeholders.
5 Capability Model
The 5 capability model has many stock and flow children which each organization will need to model based on their current state.
Semantic
Getting terms to align to the generic objects can be a trying task, unless you simply list the stakeholders "semantic" term below the stakeholder in the presentation layer by order shown in the business process management section above the capability management group.
Clone of To Be Business and Technology Architecture
The Simple Retail Sector model from Section 1.7 of
DYNAMO User's Manual by Alexander L Pugh III, which is adapted from one from
Industrial Dynamics by Jay Forrester.
http://www.amazon.com/DYNAMO-Manual-Edition-System-Dynamics/dp/0262660296 (I bought the 5th edition without realising there was a later one, hopefully it's still the same model in there.)
A tweaked version with slightly more explicit stocks is here: http://insightmaker.com/insight/14467
Clone of Clone of Simple Retail Sector
Bottom-Up Sales Forecasting for Startups
The purpose of this simulation is to demonstrate the implications of forecasting sales without consideration for how much it cost you to acquire a lead and how much you have available to spend. A common mistake in sales forecasting is to define your # of expected sales leads based on your total market size and your assumption regarding the % of that market you can reach.
This model demonstrates the forecasting impact to defining the # of expect leads based on how much it cost you to acquire a lead and how much you have available to spend.
Important Variables:
1. [UseLAC?] (set to 1 to use the lead acquisition cost to define your reachable market; use 0 to set the reachable market to equal the total available market size)
2. LAC (should equal what it cost you to acquire a lead)
3. SalesMarketingBudget : how much you have available to spend on customer acquisition
Other Variables:
4. Price : Avg spending amount per new customer
5. Total Available Market : Total available market size
6. Conversion Rate : the % of your target market that will become a lead
Clone of Bottom-up Sales Forecasting
Purpose
Enables the different components in the 5 capability model in a visual manner for Enterprise and Business Architecture stakeholders.
5 Capability Model
The 5 capability model has many stock and flow children which each organization will need to model based on their current state.
Semantic
Getting terms to align to the generic objects can be a trying task, unless you simply list the stakeholders "semantic" term below the stakeholder in the presentation layer by order shown in the business process management section above the capability management group.
Clone of To Be Business and Technology Architecture
The Problem:
What is the true cost of escalating too many Tier 1/Level 1 tickets to Level 2/3 engineers?
Things to measure: How does this impact:1. (MONEY) Cost per incident - what does this cost the business? 2. (TIME) Service Level - how does this impact desired service levels/SLAs? 3. (PEOPLE) Agent utilization - how does this impact backlog? are we overworking engineers? Does this contribute to staff burnout?
Clone of OSCON 2017: Help Desk - True Cost Impact of Improper Escalation
Clone of Grocery Store System - Stock & Flow Diagram/SD Model
Two loop structure which reflects the reinforcing effects of profits/investment, as well as profits/employee retention.
Clone of Business Growth and Stability
Clone of Clone of 2 Sided Marketplace with Churn
Production and Inventory Model
PurposeEnables the different components in the 5 capability model in a visual manner for Enterprise and Business Architecture stakeholders.
BUSINESS ARCHITECTURE 5 Capability ModelThe 5 capability model has many stock and flow children which each organization will need to model based on their current state.
- Aligns to APQC Process Framework
- Aligns to Principles in ISO 9001, 26000 and 27001
ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE Aligns Zachman Framework Enterprise and Business Architecture with Executive and Leaders from a business management level across any organization.
A method in which to align and benchmark any organization or agency, with the system(s) logic required from Architects in Row 3, to enable Row 4 engineers who need to supply physics.
SemanticGetting terms to align to the generic objects can be a trying task, unless you simply list the stakeholders "semantic" term below the stakeholder in the presentation layer by order shown in the business process management section above the capability management group.
Clone of To Be Business and Technology Architecture
Bottom-Up Sales Forecasting for Startups
The purpose of this simulation is to demonstrate the implications of forecasting sales without consideration for how much it cost you to acquire a lead and how much you have available to spend. A common mistake in sales forecasting is to define your # of expected sales leads based on your total market size and your assumption regarding the % of that market you can reach.
This model demonstrates the forecasting impact to defining the # of expect leads based on how much it cost you to acquire a lead and how much you have available to spend.
Important Variables:
1. [UseLAC?] (set to 1 to use the lead acquisition cost to define your reachable market; use 0 to set the reachable market to equal the total available market size)
2. LAC (should equal what it cost you to acquire a lead)
3. SalesMarketingBudget : how much you have available to spend on customer acquisition
Other Variables:
4. Price : Avg spending amount per new customer
5. Total Available Market : Total available market size
6. Conversion Rate : the % of your target market that will become a lead
Clone of Bottom-up Sales Forecasting
Purpose
Enables the different components in the 5 capability model in a visual manner for Enterprise and Business Architecture stakeholders.
5 Capability Model
The 5 capability model has many stock and flow children which each organization will need to model based on their current state.
Semantic
Getting terms to align to the generic objects can be a trying task, unless you simply list the stakeholders "semantic" term below the stakeholder in the presentation layer by order shown in the business process management section above the capability management group.
Clone of To Be Business and Technology Architecture
The Problem:
What is the true cost of escalating too many Tier 1/Level 1 tickets to Level 2/3 engineers?
Things to measure: How does this impact:1. (MONEY) Cost per incident - what does this cost the business? 2. (TIME) Service Level - how does this impact desired service levels/SLAs? 3. (PEOPLE) Agent utilization - how does this impact backlog? are we overworking engineers? Does this contribute to staff burnout?
Clone of OSCON 2017: Help Desk - True Cost Impact of Improper Escalation
Building a simple model to understand how to run a profitably fishing business
FishBanks_Karan_DA
Framework for analysis of strategy.
Axelrod 4 S Model
PurposeEnables the different components in the 5 capability model in a visual manner for Enterprise and Business Architecture stakeholders.
Enter volumes based on transactions from all your applications based on the business process layer. Actual transaction volumes recorded for your expense or revenue stream. Example; how many applications are sponsored by engineering that allow CREATE and UPDATE of a supplier or customer. Enter the number of transactions in the engineering variable. The engineering group has no authority to create either a supplier or customer. All organizations are allowed to submit a certain set of inputs for a super user group to review and then those super users create and update the master record.
Food for thought, the difference between the records created by the super user group and the volume of created party management records is the opportunity to scale and protect the reputation of your client.
Now lets do the same for every update to a party management record. All changes to a supplier or customer could effect pricing and tax or duty fees and each must use the formal change management process with many changes needing to have an authorized representative from the supplier or customer. Digital records are in need of key control designs. These are monitored and reported to the SEC.
BUSINESS ARCHITECTURE 5 Capability ModelThe 5 capability model has many stock and flow children which each organization will need to model based on their current state.
- Aligns to APQC Process Framework
- Aligns to Principles in ISO 9001, 26000 and 27001
ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE Aligns Zachman Framework Enterprise and Business Architecture with Executive and Leaders from a business management level across any organization.
A method in which to align and benchmark any organization or agency, with the system(s) logic required from Architects in Row 3, to enable Row 4 engineers who need to supply physics.
SemanticGetting terms to align to the generic objects can be a trying task, unless you simply list the stakeholders "semantic" term below the stakeholder in the presentation layer by order shown in the business process management section above the capability management group.
Clone of As Is and To Be Business and Technology Architecture
Model of growth from diffusion from John Morecroft's Strategic Modelling and Business Dynamics Book Ch6 p174-191. A discussion of a bigger model of People's Express is in http://bit.ly/HdaGy4 for a related You Tube video by John Morecroft on Reflections on System Dynamics and Strategy
Clone of EasyJet Fliers Model
This is a model which attempts to replicate a simple reinforcing loop described by Dennis Sherwood on page 75-87 of his book 'Seeing the forest for the trees - a manager's guide to applying systems thinking.
This is not a realistic model but I just wanted to reproduce it as practice of implementing causal loop models.
www.stantonattree.com
Clone of Seeing the forest for the trees example
The Simple Retail Sector model from Section 1.7 of
DYNAMO User's Manual by Alexander L Pugh III, which is adapted from one from
Industrial Dynamics by Jay Forrester.
http://www.amazon.com/DYNAMO-Manual-Edition-System-Dynamics/dp/0262660296 (I bought the 5th edition without realising there was a later one, hopefully it's still the same model in there.)
A tweaked version with slightly more explicit stocks is here: http://insightmaker.com/insight/14467
Clone of Simple Retail Sector
Simple Bass diffusion modified from Sterman Business Dynamics Ch9. Compare with the SI infectious disease model Insight 584, to which we added churn and duplicated it to model a 2 sided marketplace..
In this 2-sided market model -- take etsy for example -- the adoption rate of end users is also a factor of how many vendors the company has on-boarded. You can control the impact on end user adoption via the Choice Impact Factor.
Conversely, the rate at which vendors will be on-boarded is a factor of the perceived opportunity they have to sell their wares. You can control the rate at which suppliers are on-boarded via the Opportunity Impact Factor.
Copyright 2016 Whatifics Pte Ltd
Clone of Clone of 2 Sided Marketplace with Churn
The Simple Retail Sector model from Section 1.7 of
DYNAMO User's Manual by Alexander L Pugh III, which is adapted from one from
Industrial Dynamics by Jay Forrester.
http://www.amazon.com/DYNAMO-Manual-Edition-System-Dynamics/dp/0262660296 (I bought the 5th edition without realising there was a later one, hopefully it's still the same model in there.)
A tweaked version with slightly more explicit stocks is here: http://insightmaker.com/insight/14467
Clone of Simple Retail Sector
PurposeEnables the different components in the 5 capability model in a visual manner for Enterprise and Business Architecture stakeholders.
BUSINESS ARCHITECTURE 5 Capability ModelThe 5 capability model has many stock and flow children which each organization will need to model based on their current state.
- Aligns to APQC Process Framework
- Aligns to Principles in ISO 9001, 26000 and 27001
ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE Aligns Zachman Framework Enterprise and Business Architecture with Executive and Leaders from a business management level across any organization.
A method in which to align and benchmark any organization or agency, with the system(s) logic required from Architects in Row 3, to enable Row 4 engineers who need to supply physics.
SemanticGetting terms to align to the generic objects can be a trying task, unless you simply list the stakeholders "semantic" term below the stakeholder in the presentation layer by order shown in the business process management section above the capability management group.
Clone of Clone of To Be Business and Technology Architecture (Lumen Technologies)
