Insight diagram
Collapse of the economy, not just recession, is now very likely. To give just one possible cause, in the U.S. the fracking industry is in deep trouble. It is not only that most fracking companies have never achieved a free cash flow (made a profit) since the fracking boom started in 2008, but that  an already very weak  and unprofitable oil industry cannot cope with extremely low oil prices. The result will be the imminent collapse of the industry. However, when the fracking industry collapses in the US, so will the American economy – and by extension, probably, the rest of the world economy. To grasp a second and far more serious threat it is vital to understand the phenomenon of ‘Global Dimming’. Industrial activity not only produces greenhouse gases, but emits also sulphur dioxide which converts to reflective sulphate aerosols in the atmosphere. Sulphate aerosols act like little mirrors that reflect sunlight back into space, cooling the atmosphere. But when economic activity stops, these aerosols (unlike carbon dioxide) drop out of the atmosphere, adding perhaps as much as 1° C to global average temperatures. This can happen in a very short period time, and when it does mankind will be bereft of any means to mitigate the furious onslaught of an out-of-control and merciless climate. The data and the unrelenting dynamic of the viral pandemic paint bleak picture.  As events unfold in the next few months,  we may discover that it is too late to act,  that our reign on this planet has, indeed,  come to an abrupt end?  
Insight diagram

Model introduction 

This is an SIR model that simulates the potential COVID outbreak that can happen in Burnie, Tasmania after the positive case reported on October 2nd 2021, which incorporates three parts: Susceptible – Infectious – Recovered Looping model, government’s health policy that will affect each phase of the SIR process, and the potential economy that will affect people’s behaviours and thus influence the effectiveness of government’s public policy. 

 

For instance, the values of variables deciding the inflection rate are influenced by actions taken to control the situation, such as through the quarantine of those infected, social distancing, travel bans, and personal isolation and protection strategies. Conversely, the magnitude of the problem at various points in time will also influence the magnitude of the response to control the situation. 

 

Assumptions

1. The population is assumed to be homogeneous and well-mixed. And there is no significant change on the total population due to births and deaths.

2. Once lockdown is lifted, no further imported cases are assumed to occur.

3. Super spreader events are not explicitly considered. 

4. The interaction among states is assumed to be implicit. 

5. All confirmed cases would go to quarantine, and 90% of their contacts can be traced.

6. Contact tracing and testing capacity is sufficient.


Insights

Ideally, both one-way scenario analysis and two-way scenario analysis (amount change in one/two variables each time) will be conducted to find out the variable that has the greatest impact on getting new cases. Insights below can be gained:

 

1.What happens if people are more/less likely to pass on infection, through washing their hands and sneeze into their elbows (infection rate affected by people’s behaviours that will further induced by government’s policies)

2. How vaccination rate will affect the development of positive cases 

3. What if the structure of the contact network changes (extent to which school, workplace and restaurants is shut down) 

4. How growth rate is sensitive to the duration of illness and probability of infection

Insight diagram
Introduction:
This model demonstrates the COVID-19 outbreak in Burnie, Tasmania. It shows how the government policy tries to reduce the spread of COVID-19 whilst also impacting the local economy.

Assumptions:
This model has four variables that influence the number of COVID-19 cases: infection rate, immunity loss rate, recovery rate and death rate.

In order to reduce the pandemic spread, in this model, assume the government released six policies when Burnie COVID-19 cases are equal or over 10 cases. Policies are vaccination promotion, travel restriction to Burnie, quarantine, social distance, lockdown and testing rate.

Government policies would reduce the pandemic. However, it decreases economic growth at the same time. In this model, only list three variable that influence local economic activities. 
Travel restrictions and quarantine will reduce Burnie tourism and decrease the local economy. On the other hand, quarantine, social distance, lockdown allow people to stay at home, increasing E-commerce business.
As a result, policies that cause fewer COVID-19 cases also cause more considerable negative damage to the economy.

Interesting insights:
One of the interesting findings is that the government policy would reduce the COVID-19 spread significantly if I adjust the total government policies are over 20% (vaccine promotion, travel restriction, quarantine, social distance, lockdown), 3560 people will die, then no more people get COVID-19.
However, if I change the total government policy to less than 5%, the whole Burnie people will die according to the model. Therefore, we need to follow the polices, which saves our lives.