INTRODUCTION
This is a balanced loop model that demonstrates how COVID 19 outbreak in Burnie and the response of the government (e.g. by enforcing health policies: Lockdown; quarantine, non-necessary business closure; border closure) affect the local economy. This model has 13 positive loops and seven negative loops. Government response is dependent on the number of reported COVID-19 cases which in turn thought to be dependent on the testing rates less those who recovered from COVID 19 and dead. Economic activity is dependent on the economic growth rate, increased in online shopping, increased in unemployment, number of people who do not obey the rules, COVID 19 cases and health policies.
ASSUMPTIONS
· Both infection and economic growth is reduced by enforcing government policies
· However, the negative effect of government policies is reduced by the number of people who do not obey government health policies
· Govt policies are enforced when the reported COVID-19 case are 10 or greater.
· Number of COVID cases reported is dependent on the testing rates less those who recovered and dead.
· The higher number of COVID-19 cases have a
negative effect on local economy. This phenomena is known as negative signalling.
· Government policies have a negative effect on economic activity because health policies limit both social and economic activities which directly or indirectly affect the economy in Burnie .
· This negative effect is somewhat reduced by the increase in online shopping and the number of people who do not obey heath rules.
INTERESTING INSIGHTS
The test ratings seem to play a vital role in controlling COVID-19 outbreak. Higher Rates of COVID testings decrease the number of COVID 19 deaths and number of infected. This is because higher rates of testing accelerate the government involvement (as the government intervention is triggered earlier, 10 COVID cases mark is reached earlier). Delaying the government intervention by reducing the COVID testing rates increases the death rates and number of infected.
Increased testing rates allow the figures (deaths, susceptible, infected) to reach a plateau quickly.
Goodwin cycle IM-2010 with debt and taxes added, modified from Steve Keen. THis can be extended by adding the Ponzi effect of borrowing for speculative investment.
Projeto de investimentos , custos e viabilidade econômico de LCC
A planta foi dimensionada para produzir 9.000 Ton/ano da Resina usando o matéria prima
LCC , operando 24h/dia, durante os três turnos por 300 dias/anuais. O preço do produto de projeto de lcc
veja o prova html aula passados
1. Calcule o investimento em planta (If) usando o método rápido e investimento em
equipamento (Ie) baseado no método de lang. Admita valor de N e f1 de acordo com o fluxograma do processo.
Dados fornecidos: Entrada (alimentação)-sólido; Saída-líquido;
Equipamentos principais da produção: Destilador e fermentador.
2. Calcule o investimento fixo total pelo método chilton através das estimativas dos investimentos fixos diretos: Tubulação, instrumentação, estrutura física, planta de serviço e conexões entre unidades; e investimentos fixos indiretos. Tome como base o investimento em equipamentos.
veja dados na prova html simulados sobre fator chiltons , modelos de lang , decico , chiltons e dados na prova html
3. Calcule o custo de mão-de- obra direta e indireta baseando-se no fluxograma de processo , atualizando o valor salário mínimo e nos salários:
Valor do salário mínimo = R$180,00
Engenheiro químico = 10 salários mínimos
Operador industrial = 3 salários mínimos
Administração:
Gerente = 8 salários mínimos
Auxiliar de escritório = 3 salários mínimos
Secretária = 2 salários mínimos
Dados fornecidos: Considere os encargos sociais de 65% sobre o salário base. Mão-de- obra
indireta seja 20% da mão-de- obra direta. O custo de mão-de- obra indireta engloba
manutenção.
4. Calcule os custos fixos abaixo, baseando-se pelo método Sebrae:
Dados
4.1 Depreciação = 10%If
4.2 Manutenção = 3%If
4.3 Seguro = 1%If
4.4 Imposto = 2%If
5. Calcule o custo de consumo anual de matéria-prima de acordo com os dados , veja prova html a seguir
5.2 Calcule o custo unitário de matéria prima sendo 80% do valor do custo total anual da
matéria-prima. , dados , veja na link enunciados e prova html
6. Calcule os custos totais:
6.1 Encargos anuais
6.2 Administração = 0.6 (mão-de- obra direta + mão-de- obra indireta + encargos anuais)
6.3 Suprimentos = 0.15 (Manutenção)
6.4 Calcule os custos fixos
6.5 Calcule os custos variáveis
6.6 Calcule os custos variáveis
* Os custos fixos englobam administração
Custo variável = custo de matéria – prima + custo de utilitários + custo de suprimentos.
Custo de suprimentos é 10% da mão-de- obra direta.
Depreciação = 10% do investimento fixo.
7. Estimar o ponto de equilíbrio em quantidade e em porcentagem baseado em dados obtidos de custo variável unitário) e Custo fixo do problema 06.
8. Estime os itens da análise de investimento:
– Taxa de retorno de engenharia simples
– Tempo de retorno
– % de lucro em relação ao preço de venda
– Lucro após o imposto de renda
– Lucratividade
– Rentabilidade
– Fluxo de caixa
9. Estimar potencial econômico de projeto de perdas devido ao baixo rendimento de operação em nível de 90% de rendimento máximo em vez de 98%.
Dados de consumos de materiais e energia obtidos via uso de calculadora usando quiz html de modelos já apresentados aula passos
NOME E DESCRIÇÃO
LINK
TAMANHO
Prova1validacao.:Investimento Fixo e Tomada de Decisões Rápidas
https://canvas.instructure.com/courses/780776/files/folder/provahtml?preview=51184101
33 KB
Prova.2 Validacao .Investimento fixo método Lang
https://canvas.instructure.com/courses/780776/files/folder/provahtml?preview=5118414432 KB
Prova 3 :Investimento Fixo método Chilton
ihttps://canvas.instructure.com/courses/780776/files/folder/provahtml?preview=51184169
33 KB
Prova4:Custo Fixo
https://canvas.instructure.com/courses/780776/files/folder/provahtml?preview=5118418932 KB
Prova 5::Custo de mao de obra
customaohtm custo de mao de obra
33 KB
Prova 6 Validao : Custo de mat,comb e enegia
CustoMat prima , energia
34 KB
Prova 7 Custo total
custo de operacional de producao33 KB
Prova 8 Ponto deEquilibrio
ponto de eqilibrioibrio
32 KB
Prova 9:Analise de lucro e beneficios
Fluxo de caixa33 KB
There is plenty of empiric evidence to show that this has happened time and time again. For instance, a report from UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development) found that between 1990 and 2000 in all the cases examined where cutbacks in public spending and tax increases were used, the fiscal situation did not only not improve but worsened. Despite such repeated evidence, unfortunately calls for austerity measures continue to be heard.
CLD exposition of Goodwin01 from Steve Keen's August 2019 course on Introduction to Economic Dynamics and Minsky software See video and powerpoint slides. Based on IM-2011 Minsky FIH and IM-168865 MacroEconomics CLDs. SeeIM-172005 for Simulation
From Neil WIlson and Steve Keen's double entry accounting view of the money circuit model
The inverse curve is the trust time
On the right the increase in failures brings its inverse which is loss of trust and move into suspicion and lack of confidence.
This can be seen in strategic social applications with those who put economy before providing the priorities of the basic living infrastructures for all.
This applies to policies and strategic decisions as well as physical equipment.
A) Equipment wears out through friction and preventive maintenance can increase the useful lifetime,
B) Policies/working practices/guidelines have to be updated to reflect changes in the external environment and eventually be replaced when for instance a population rises too large (constitutional changes are required to keep pace with evolution, e.g. the concepts of the ancient Greeks, 3000 years ago, who based their thoughts on a small population cannot be applied in 2013 except where populations can be contained into productive working communities with balanced profit and loss centers to ensure sustainability)
Early Life
Useful Life
Wearout
Developed and implemented by Joao G. Ferreira and Camille Saurel; growth data from Eva Galimany, Gary Wickfors, and Julie Rose; driver data from Julie Rose and Suzanne Bricker; Culture practice from the REServ team and Tessa Getchis. This model is a workbench for combining ecological and economic components for REServ. Economic component added by Trina Wellman.
This is a one box model for an idealized farm with one million oysters seeded (one hectare @ a stocking density of 100 oysters per square meter)
1. Run WinShell individual growth model for one year with Long Island Sound growth drivers;
2. Determine the scope for growth (in dry tissue weight per day) for oysters centered on the five weight classes)
3. Apply a classic population dynamics equation:
dn(s,t)/dt = -d[n(s,t)g(s,t)]/ds - u(s)n(s,t)
s: Weight (g)
t: Time
n: Number of individuals of weight s
g: Scope for growth (g day-1)
u: Mortality rate (day-1)
4. Set mortality at 30% per year, slider allows scenarios from 30% to 80% per year
5. Determine harvestable biomass, i.e. weight class 5, 40-50 g (roughly three inches length)
