WIP Clone of IM-435 for Research (IM-345 was https://insightmaker.com/insight/435/Technology-and-Healthcare-Costs-and-Outcomes-2A simplified dynamic model, adapted from Engineering perspectives on healthcare delivery: Can we afford technological innovation in healthcare? Rouse, William B Systems Research and Behavioral Science 2009 Vol 26 (5) p573-582 abstract Developed by Mark Heffernan See also IM-614 for learning effects.
Research Costs and Outcomes
Clone of Plastic Pollution Solution Revolution
WIP Summary of Mariana Mazzucato's 2018 book See also IM-901 MacroEc
The Value of Everything
Simple Bass diffusion modified from Sterman Business Dynamics Ch9. Compare with the SI infectious disease model Insight 584.
Diffusion of Innovation Bass Model
Simple Bass diffusion modified from Sterman Business Dynamics Ch9, with additional discarding
Clone of Diffusion of Innovation Model with Discards
There is a general belief that wind and solar will
enable us to get fossil-fuels-use to net-zero. This is, unfortunately,
impossible as an examination of only some limitations and constraints associated
with solar and wind energy will show. Solar panels and wind turbines have now been used for many years, but
until now they represent only a tiny fraction of total energy use (not just
electricity but all forms of energy). In 2020, wind accounted for 3% of
the world’s total energy consumption and solar amounted to 1% of total energy. Thus,
the combination of wind and solar produced only 4% of world energy in 2020. How
long will we have to wait before they can generate enough energy to power the
world? The climate emergency will not wait. Solar panels and wind turbines have average
lifespans of around 15 to 30 years, then they need to be replaced. However, the
manufacture of the replacements will require fossil fuels since one
cannot use wind or solar to build wind and solar. Further, solar panels do not supply
enough energy. The net-energy gained from solar panels is only about 3.9:1. This
net-energy ratio is known as ‘energy return on energy invested’ (EROI) and is
critically important. Unfortunately,
the EROI of solar is far too low to power a modern industrial society,
which requires an EROI of about 12:1. There is also the question of space. Renewable
energy sources can take up 1000 times more space than fossil fuel – that is bad news for agriculture and food production in a world that is already experiencing
food shortages because of global warming. If you take these limitations into consideration,
then it becomes clear that solar and wind cannot solve our energy problem – they
are a fix that will inevitably fail.
Clone of Climate Emergency: Wind and Solar are Fixes-that-Fail
The Problem:
What is the true cost of escalating too many Tier 1/Level 1 tickets to Level 2/3 engineers?
Things to measure: How does this impact:1. (MONEY) Cost per incident - what does this cost the business? 2. (TIME) Service Level - how does this impact desired service levels/SLAs? 3. (PEOPLE) Agent utilization - how does this impact backlog? are we overworking engineers? Does this contribute to staff burnout?
Clone of OSCON 2017: Help Desk - True Cost Impact of Improper Escalation
Clone of Clone of 2 Sided Marketplace with Churn
PurposeEnables the different components in the 5 capability model in a visual manner for Enterprise and Business Architecture stakeholders.
Enter volumes based on transactions from all your applications based on the business process layer. Actual transaction volumes recorded for your expense or revenue stream. Example; how many applications are sponsored by engineering that allow CREATE and UPDATE of a supplier or customer. Enter the number of transactions in the engineering variable. The engineering group has no authority to create either a supplier or customer. All organizations are allowed to submit a certain set of inputs for a super user group to review and then those super users create and update the master record.
Food for thought, the difference between the records created by the super user group and the volume of created party management records is the opportunity to scale and protect the reputation of your client.
Now lets do the same for every update to a party management record. All changes to a supplier or customer could effect pricing and tax or duty fees and each must use the formal change management process with many changes needing to have an authorized representative from the supplier or customer. Digital records are in need of key control designs. These are monitored and reported to the SEC.
BUSINESS ARCHITECTURE 5 Capability ModelThe 5 capability model has many stock and flow children which each organization will need to model based on their current state.
- Aligns to APQC Process Framework
- Aligns to Principles in ISO 9001, 26000 and 27001
ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE Aligns Zachman Framework Enterprise and Business Architecture with Executive and Leaders from a business management level across any organization.
A method in which to align and benchmark any organization or agency, with the system(s) logic required from Architects in Row 3, to enable Row 4 engineers who need to supply physics.
SemanticGetting terms to align to the generic objects can be a trying task, unless you simply list the stakeholders "semantic" term below the stakeholder in the presentation layer by order shown in the business process management section above the capability management group.
Clone of As Is and To Be Business and Technology Architecture
Purpose
Enables the different components in the 5 capability model in a visual manner for Enterprise and Business Architecture stakeholders.
5 Capability Model
The 5 capability model has many stock and flow children which each organization will need to model based on their current state.
Semantic
Getting terms to align to the generic objects can be a trying task, unless you simply list the stakeholders "semantic" term below the stakeholder in the presentation layer by order shown in the business process management section above the capability management group.
Clone of To Be Business and Technology Architecture
Purpose 1 New Small Business - Cloud Support Model
Purpose-To enable a visual model to acquire new business owners to adopt cloud services.
Purpose 2 Cloud Service Provider Delivery Model-Service
2. The purpose of this model intends to allow a cloud service provider a way to design offers for generic use across any industry.
Outcome - Key Control for Segregation of Duties GAAP/GARP
3. The purpose of this model incorporates the variables of different components for completeness and monitoring scope for any master data update or create activity.
Outcome - Key Controls for SOX 404 Assurances
Monitoring all activities for segregation of duties controls - in a control chart. The model ensures a completeness criteria for cost structuring of any new offer or acquisition integration.
GAAP-Non-GAAP Revenue
The primary inputs shown on this diagram trigger the leverage points for many of the dependent processes and management of an offers revenue treatment.
Completeness - Supplies the various parts of the whole
Organization or Agency models - simulations
Stock and Flow models enable simulation of the proposed design with a better view into results of any proposed changes.
Enterprise Architecture Value
Predict changes and prepare for complexity based on the risk using the components simulated in stock and flow diagrams.
Model and simulate the "as is" and "to be" or monitor as the way to ensure your architecture stability and when investments need to be made in a next generation strategy.
Business Architecture Value
Use the whole and parts (stock and flow child) to better understand the "current state" measuring the transition to the desired state on the journey to a performance model.
The model applies the rows from Enterprise Architecture as prescribed by Zachman Ontology v3. Based on the way business requirements need to be applied to technology solutions.
Row 1 - Executive - Context of the organization
Row 2 - Business Managers - Business Process connectivity
Row 3 - Architects - Systems - The transition from Business to Enterprise Architects.
Ideally-the offer management capability serves as one of 5 capabilities which must be in place to meet both financial and quality certification criteria for the majority of companies.
Highway Analogy
A 5 capability model enables the audit relationships between different master record management audit log tracking for SOX to be used by quality management to align with corporate policies which intend to guide decision making within any size and any type organization or agency.
Applied
The system model would be copied by an organizations resource and inputs applied to a stock and flow diagram as prescribed in associated models. Herein we must assume the whole and each of the stock and flow simulation models the component parts.
Clone of Offer Management Capability Generic Model
Purpose 1 New Small Business - Cloud Support Model
Purpose-To enable a visual model to acquire new business owners to adopt cloud services.
Purpose 2 Cloud Service Provider Delivery Model-Service
2. The purpose of this model intends to allow a cloud service provider a way to design offers for generic use across any industry.
Outcome - Key Control for Segregation of Duties GAAP/GARP
3. The purpose of this model incorporates the variables of different components for completeness and monitoring scope for any master data update or create activity.
Outcome - Key Controls for SOX 404 Assurances
Monitoring all activities for segregation of duties controls - in a control chart. The model ensures a completeness criteria for cost structuring of any new offer or acquisition integration.
GAAP-Non-GAAP Revenue
The primary inputs shown on this diagram trigger the leverage points for many of the dependent processes and management of an offers revenue treatment.
Completeness - Supplies the various parts of the whole
Organization or Agency models - simulations
Stock and Flow models enable simulation of the proposed design with a better view into results of any proposed changes.
Enterprise Architecture Value
Predict changes and prepare for complexity based on the risk using the components simulated in stock and flow diagrams.
Model and simulate the "as is" and "to be" or monitor as the way to ensure your architecture stability and when investments need to be made in a next generation strategy.
Business Architecture Value
Use the whole and parts (stock and flow child) to better understand the "current state" measuring the transition to the desired state on the journey to a performance model.
The model applies the rows from Enterprise Architecture as prescribed by Zachman Ontology v3. Based on the way business requirements need to be applied to technology solutions.
Row 1 - Executive - Context of the organization
Row 2 - Business Managers - Business Process connectivity
Row 3 - Architects - Systems - The transition from Business to Enterprise Architects.
Ideally-the offer management capability serves as one of 5 capabilities which must be in place to meet both financial and quality certification criteria for the majority of companies.
Highway Analogy
A 5 capability model enables the audit relationships between different master record management audit log tracking for SOX to be used by quality management to align with corporate policies which intend to guide decision making within any size and any type organization or agency.
Applied
The system model would be copied by an organizations resource and inputs applied to a stock and flow diagram as prescribed in associated models. Herein we must assume the whole and each of the stock and flow simulation models the component parts.
Clone of Offer Management Capability Generic Model
The Problem:
What is the true cost of escalating too many Tier 1/Level 1 tickets to Level 2/3 engineers?
Things to measure: How does this impact:1. (MONEY) Cost per incident - what does this cost the business? 2. (TIME) Service Level - how does this impact desired service levels/SLAs? 3. (PEOPLE) Agent utilization - how does this impact backlog? are we overworking engineers? Does this contribute to staff burnout?
Clone of OSCON 2017: Help Desk - True Cost Impact of Improper Escalation
Simplest Innovation diffusion model from Sterman Business Dynamics Ch9, with Correlation coefficients added, from Taylor TRB et al. (2010) Improving model understanding using statistical screening System Dynamics Review 26 (1) p 73-87
Clone of Innovation Diffusion Model with Correlation
Purpose 1 New Small Business - Cloud Support Model
Purpose-To enable a visual model to acquire new business owners to adopt cloud services.
Purpose 2 Cloud Service Provider Delivery Model-Service
2. The purpose of this model intends to allow a cloud service provider a way to design offers for generic use across any industry.
Outcome - Key Control for Segregation of Duties GAAP/GARP
3. The purpose of this model incorporates the variables of different components for completeness and monitoring scope for any master data update or create activity.
Outcome - Key Controls for SOX 404 Assurances
Monitoring all activities for segregation of duties controls - in a control chart. The model ensures a completeness criteria for cost structuring of any new offer or acquisition integration.
GAAP-Non-GAAP Revenue
The primary inputs shown on this diagram trigger the leverage points for many of the dependent processes and management of an offers revenue treatment.
Completeness - Supplies the various parts of the whole
Organization or Agency models - simulations
Stock and Flow models enable simulation of the proposed design with a better view into results of any proposed changes.
Enterprise Architecture Value
Predict changes and prepare for complexity based on the risk using the components simulated in stock and flow diagrams.
Model and simulate the "as is" and "to be" or monitor as the way to ensure your architecture stability and when investments need to be made in a next generation strategy.
Business Architecture Value
Use the whole and parts (stock and flow child) to better understand the "current state" measuring the transition to the desired state on the journey to a performance model.
The model applies the rows from Enterprise Architecture as prescribed by Zachman Ontology v3. Based on the way business requirements need to be applied to technology solutions.
Row 1 - Executive - Context of the organization
Row 2 - Business Managers - Business Process connectivity
Row 3 - Architects - Systems - The transition from Business to Enterprise Architects.
Ideally-the offer management capability serves as one of 5 capabilities which must be in place to meet both financial and quality certification criteria for the majority of companies.
Highway Analogy
A 5 capability model enables the audit relationships between different master record management audit log tracking for SOX to be used by quality management to align with corporate policies which intend to guide decision making within any size and any type organization or agency.
Applied
The system model would be copied by an organizations resource and inputs applied to a stock and flow diagram as prescribed in associated models. Herein we must assume the whole and each of the stock and flow simulation models the component parts.
Clone of Offer Management Capability Generic Model
Simple Bass diffusion with repeat purchases, modified from Sterman Business Dynamics Ch9
Clone of Diffusion of Innovation Model Repurchases
PurposeEnables the different components in the 5 capability model in a visual manner for Enterprise and Business Architecture stakeholders.
BUSINESS ARCHITECTURE 5 Capability ModelThe 5 capability model has many stock and flow children which each organization will need to model based on their current state.
- Aligns to APQC Process Framework
- Aligns to Principles in ISO 9001, 26000 and 27001
ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE Aligns Zachman Framework Enterprise and Business Architecture with Executive and Leaders from a business management level across any organization.
A method in which to align and benchmark any organization or agency, with the system(s) logic required from Architects in Row 3, to enable Row 4 engineers who need to supply physics.
SemanticGetting terms to align to the generic objects can be a trying task, unless you simply list the stakeholders "semantic" term below the stakeholder in the presentation layer by order shown in the business process management section above the capability management group.
Clone of To Be Business and Technology Architecture
Purpose
Enables the different components in the 5 capability model in a visual manner for Enterprise and Business Architecture stakeholders.
5 Capability Model
The 5 capability model has many stock and flow children which each organization will need to model based on their current state.
Semantic
Getting terms to align to the generic objects can be a trying task, unless you simply list the stakeholders "semantic" term below the stakeholder in the presentation layer by order shown in the business process management section above the capability management group.
Clone of To Be Business and Technology Architecture
Launchpad for A Systems Approach to eHealth
eHealth Systems Approach
Clone of Clone 26/07/16 of Plastic Pollution Solution Revolution
Purpose 1 New Small Business - Cloud Support Model
Purpose-To enable a visual model to acquire new business owners to adopt cloud services.
Purpose 2 Cloud Service Provider Delivery Model-Service
2. The purpose of this model intends to allow a cloud service provider a way to design offers for generic use across any industry.
Outcome - Key Control for Segregation of Duties GAAP/GARP
3. The purpose of this model incorporates the variables of different components for completeness and monitoring scope for any master data update or create activity.
Outcome - Key Controls for SOX 404 Assurances
Monitoring all activities for segregation of duties controls - in a control chart. The model ensures a completeness criteria for cost structuring of any new offer or acquisition integration.
GAAP-Non-GAAP Revenue
The primary inputs shown on this diagram trigger the leverage points for many of the dependent processes and management of an offers revenue treatment.
Completeness - Supplies the various parts of the whole
Organization or Agency models - simulations
Stock and Flow models enable simulation of the proposed design with a better view into results of any proposed changes.
Enterprise Architecture Value
Predict changes and prepare for complexity based on the risk using the components simulated in stock and flow diagrams.
Model and simulate the "as is" and "to be" or monitor as the way to ensure your architecture stability and when investments need to be made in a next generation strategy.
Business Architecture Value
Use the whole and parts (stock and flow child) to better understand the "current state" measuring the transition to the desired state on the journey to a performance model.
The model applies the rows from Enterprise Architecture as prescribed by Zachman Ontology v3. Based on the way business requirements need to be applied to technology solutions.
Row 1 - Executive - Context of the organization
Row 2 - Business Managers - Business Process connectivity
Row 3 - Architects - Systems - The transition from Business to Enterprise Architects.
Ideally-the offer management capability serves as one of 5 capabilities which must be in place to meet both financial and quality certification criteria for the majority of companies.
Highway Analogy
A 5 capability model enables the audit relationships between different master record management audit log tracking for SOX to be used by quality management to align with corporate policies which intend to guide decision making within any size and any type organization or agency.
Applied
The system model would be copied by an organizations resource and inputs applied to a stock and flow diagram as prescribed in associated models. Herein we must assume the whole and each of the stock and flow simulation models the component parts.
Clone of Clone of Offer Management Capability Generic Model
The Problem:
What is the true cost of escalating too many Tier 1/Level 1 tickets to Level 2/3 engineers?
Things to measure: How does this impact:1. (MONEY) Cost per incident - what does this cost the business? 2. (TIME) Service Level - how does this impact desired service levels/SLAs? 3. (PEOPLE) Agent utilization - how does this impact backlog? are we overworking engineers? Does this contribute to staff burnout?
Clone of OSCON 2017: Help Desk - True Cost Impact of Improper Escalation
Purpose
Enables the different components in the 5 capability model in a visual manner for Enterprise and Business Architecture stakeholders.
5 Capability Model
The 5 capability model has many stock and flow children which each organization will need to model based on their current state.
Semantic
Getting terms to align to the generic objects can be a trying task, unless you simply list the stakeholders "semantic" term below the stakeholder in the presentation layer by order shown in the business process management section above the capability management group.
Clone of To Be Business and Technology Architecture
The Problem:
What is the true cost of escalating too many Tier 1/Level 1 tickets to Level 2/3 engineers?
Things to measure: How does this impact:1. (MONEY) Cost per incident - what does this cost the business? 2. (TIME) Service Level - how does this impact desired service levels/SLAs? 3. (PEOPLE) Agent utilization - how does this impact backlog? are we overworking engineers? Does this contribute to staff burnout?
Clone of OSCON 2017: Help Desk - True Cost Impact of Improper Escalation