This model shows how a persistent pollutant such as mercury or DDT can be bioamplified along a trophic chain to levels that result in reduction of top predator populations.

To calculate the emission from mobile sources (road traffic) in DKI Jakarta, Indonesia

A simple phosphorus model for a generic lake.

This diagram provides an accessible description of the key processes that influence the water quality within a lake.

A simulation illustrating simple predator prey dynamics. You have two populations.

Clone of Pesticide Use in Central America for Lab work

The time-variable solution to a step-function change in inflow concentration for an ideal, completely mixed lake.

WIP Stock Flow representation of Panarchy Adaptive Cycles

This model implements the equations proposed by Ketchum in 1954. The rationale behind the concept is that only phytoplankton that grows above a certain rate will not be flushed out of an estuary.

For biological processes:

Pt  =  Po exp(kt)

Where Pt is the phytoplankton biomass at time t, Po is the initial biomass, and k is the growth rate.

For physical processes:

Pm  =  Po (1-r)^m

Where Pm is the phytoplankton biomass after m tidal cycles, and r is the exchange ratio (proportion of estuary water which does not return each tidal cycle).

By substitution, and replacing t by m in the first equation, we get:

Pm = Poexp(km).(1-r)^m

For phytoplankton to exist in an estuary, Pm = Po (at least), i.e. 1 / (1-r)^m = exp(km)
ln(1) - m.ln(1-r) = km
-m.ln(1-r) = km
k = -ln(1-r)

Ketchum (1954) Relation between circulation and planktonic populations in estuaries. Ecology 35: 191-200.

In 2005, Ferreira and co-workers showed that this balance has direct implications on biodiversity of estuarine phytoplankton, and discussed how this could be relevant for water management, in particular for the EU Water Framework Directive 60/2000/EC (Ecological Modelling, 187(4) 513-523).

The simulation integrates or sums (INTEG) the Nj population, with a change of Delta N in each generation, starting with an initial value of 5.Nj+1 = Nj  + mu (1- Nj / Nmax ) Nj

Delta Nj: is the “change in number of items” as we go from the present generation into the next generation. This is just the number of items born minus the number of items who have died.

mu: is the growth or birth rate parameter, similar to that in the exponential growth and decay model. However, as we extend our model it will no longer be the actual growth rate, but rather just a constant that tends to control the actual growth rate without being directly proportional to it.

F(Nj) = mu(1‐Nj/Nmax): is our model for the effective “growth rate”, a rate that decreases as the number of items approaches the maximum allowed by external factors such as food supply, disease or predation. (You can think of mu as the growth or birth rate in the absence of population pressure from other items.) We write this rate as F(Nj), which is a mathematical way of saying F is affected by the number of items, i.e., “F is a function of Nj”. It combines both growth and all the various environmental constraints on growth into a single function. This is a good approach to modeling; start with something that works (exponential growth) and then modify it incrementally, while still incorporating the working model.

Nj+1 = Nj + Delta Nj : This is a mathematical way to say, “The new number of items equals the old number of items plus the change in number of items”.

Nj/Nmax: is what fraction a population has reached of the maximum "carrying capacity" allowed by the external environment. We use this fraction to change the overall growth rate of the population. In the real world, as well as in our model, it is possible for a population to be greater than the maximum population (which is usually an average of many years), at least for a short period of time. This means that we can expect fluctuations in which Nj/Nmax is greater than 1.

This model illustrates predator prey interactions using real-life data of bison and wolf populations at Yellowstone National Park.

This model implements a very simple proxy for vertical dispersion of heat in a lake based on the equation:

dT/dt = 1/A d(EA)/dz (dT/dz)

where: T: temperature (oC); t: time (days); z: depth (m); A: cross-sectional area (m2); E: vertical dispersion coefficient (m2 d-1)

If we consider that E is constant (it is in this model), then the equation becomes dT/dt = (EA/A)(d^2T/dz^2) = E(d^2T/dz^2), the classic diffusion equation

The model is simplified by exchanging temperature as a state variable, rather than executing  the full heat balance. This would require a computation of fluxes of atmospheric longwave and shortwave radiation, water longwave radiation, water conduction and convection, and water evaporation and condensation.

The vertical dispersion coefficients are adjusted artificially so that mixing increases at lower temperatures, thus quickly homogenizing the water column in colder months of the year.

As initially proposed by Pr. William M White of Cornell University:

For school

This model describes the flow of energy from generation to consumption for neighborhoods in the metro Atlanta area. It also calculates the cost of energy production and the number of years it will take to recover that cost.

This is a simple Model of the Food Chain

Simple mass balance model for lakes, based on the Vollenweider equation:

dMw/dt = Min - sMw - Mout

The model was first used in the 1960s to determine the phosphorus concentration in lakes and reservoirs for eutrophication assessment.

This version adds diagenesis, using an extra state variable (phosphorus in the sediment) and incorporates desorption processes that release phosphorus trapped in the sediment back to the water column.

The temporal dynamics of the model simulate the typical development of pollution in time.

1. Low loading, low P concentration in lake
2. High loading, increasing P concentration in lake
3. Desorption rate is low, P in sediment increases
4. Measures implemented for source control, loading reduces
5. P in lake gradually decreases, but below a certain point, desorption increases, and lake P concentration does not improve
6. Recovery only occurs when the secondary load in the sediment is strongly reduced.